I can’t remember in my short 31 years on this planet of ever having read or heard about a POTUS referring to regular people who have had honest disagreements with them as “angry mobs.” I am just a concerned citizen who didn’t like the out of control government spending started by George W. Bush and increased one thousand fold with Barack Obama. I got involved with my local Tea Party group under my own volition and I met other regular people who did’nt like the out of control spending and failure of our elected officials to listen to our concerns. These people, just like me, are simply just regular folks who are concerned about the path our country is headed down. Most of us have never protested before, been to a rally or joined a march. We aren’t racists or bitter because we lost the election. Our anger is not manufactured or funded by high end concerns. Finally we are a real grassroots movement not an Astroturf brigade with pre-made protest signs, group t-shirts, hats, pins, buttons and chants.

Just so there is no confusion, pictured below is what an Astroturf movement looks like

Below is what real grassroots protesters look like. Do you notice the difference? No group shirts, pre-made signs, pre-made banners, etc.

What Obama and the left fail to understand or what they underestimated is that the silent majority, whose previous political involvement was only to vote in general elections, would remain silent forever. Just like in the movie Network they are “mad as hell and they’re not gonna take it anymore!” Many people falsely assume that once an election is over there is nothing you can do about. If you don’t like what is going on all you can do is just wait for the next election. This is absolutely untrue and the Tea Party movement and town hall meetings are waking people up to this. They are calling their representatives in Washington and reminding them that they work for us and that they’ll work for someone else if they help pass this government takeover of health care. This is how you have your voices heard. This is how you hold them accountable. This is democracy!

Now Obama is using two tactics from the book Rules For Radicals by Saul Alinsky to try and demonize us. Alinsky was a Marxist community organizer and a major influence upon Barack Obama.

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

That’s pretty crude, rude and mean, right? They want to create anger and fear.

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

Once again its cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works and you’ve seen it in action with the new ads by the DNC calling people who opposes the health care insurance overhaul takeover as “angry mobs of rabid right wing extremists funded by K Street Lobbyists to disrupt thoughtful discussions about the future of health care in America taking place in Congressional Districts across the country.” This is of course laughable and not true and very hypocritical considering that the President has used the techniques that he wrongly accuses others of using. Straight from the horses mouth:

The feistier, more sarcastic tone came as worried Democrats urged Obama to get tougher and show more passion. Obama has tried to assure donors and voters that he’s been schooled by Chicago politics…

In Elko, Obama tried to anticipate his critics and called on the crowd of about 1,500 to sharpen their elbows, too.

“I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face,” he said.

“And if they tell you that, ‘Well, we’re not sure where he stands on guns.’ I want you to say, ‘He believes in the Second Amendment.’ If they tell you, ‘Well, he’s going to raise your taxes,’ you say, ‘No, he’s not, he’s going lower them.’ You are my ambassadors. You guys are the ones who can make the case.”

According to the left its okay to protest in support of their causes but you are part of an angry mob if you protest against. Please read this post after you watch the clip below to get a complete understanding of the subject.

Related posts:

1. Liberals Are Liberal About Everything Except Liberty
2. Promise them anything…
3. Health rations and you
4. Obama’s “Read My Lips” Moment
5. Ron Paul is Unconstitutional…

Mabuse: “It’s not unprecedented. When President Bush was here, you will remember, in February, there were people who were drumming, there were dances, and President Bush joined some of them.”

I’m surprised that he didn’t ask her about Obama’s “swagga.” Maybe someone should remind Don that Bush did far more for Africa than any other person on the planet. Where are his kudos?

Related posts:

1. Ron Paul and the Media
2. Esquire Ponders: Is Obama Black Enough?
3. Obama: Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Don Bendell

Barack Obama speaks of “Change you can believe in?” Consider this: John McCain and Barack Obama both gave their word to use public campaign financing for their campaigns. Barack Obama told Hillary Clinton, during one of their debates that, if nominated, he would sit down with John McCain and discuss how they would coordinate their campaigns and funding. Then he broke his word again and refused to do that. These things are not conjecture but are known proven facts. So, although Barack Obama has proven he has no qualms about breaking his word that does not seem to bother his base, who are more concerned with their 401K than having a President with integrity. So let us just talk about numbers, facts, and common sense.

Obama lied and McCain kept his word, but look what both have done. Obama, his panicked party, the mainstream media, and all those inside the DC Beltway are scared to death about the real change McCain-Palin will bring to Washington . Why is John McCain able to work within the relatively limited constraints of the tiny budget he has been handed with public financing and is tied in most places with Barack Obama? Think about it, please? Obama has outspent McCain by eight times as much money in some swing states. Again, that is proven fact. Why is it taking Barack Obama to use from 3 to 8 times as much money as John McCain to do the same job essentially? Obama has had to cheat and lie to raise more money, much more to run his campaign, and John McCain has worked within the constraints of what the law allows and is still neck-and- neck with Obama. Now simply use common sense. What does that tell you about who will be the best steward of our national budget? Who will actually cut wasteful spending and who will plunge us into a Great Depression?

Barack Obama has had to wheel and deal and use his golden-tongue to broker new deals to obtain more campaign finances, hundreds of millions of dollars more to try to win this election and get the job done. So, if he is elected, why would managing a delicate federal budget be any different? Would he not, by hook or crook, have to obtain more financing to get the job done? Translation? Higher taxes for all. John McCain on the other hand, his honor and credibility still intact; as always, set his jaw, kept his word, and has made his campaign work with a very limited budget. Again, common sense.

This tells any thinking person one thing and one thing only. Barack Obama will indeed bring real change to Washington : Al Capone Chicago-style politics?

Related posts:

1. The Closing Argument
2. This is America, Wake Up!
3. Say No to John McCain!!!
4. The Geezer, Witch or Sleeper Agent?
5. The Obama Party

Don Bendell

Why did I go to Vietnam, my sons go to Iraq, my uncles to the Philippines in WWII and the Korean War, if we cannot simply express freedom of speech? What has become of our nation? A sheriff at a political rally in Florida made a comment about McCain beating “Barack Hussein Obama,” and he was investigated by the feds and crucified by the news media! Newspapers and TV media will not use Obama’s middle name period. Gee, here is a suggestion, Senator Barack Hussein Obama: Change your middle name if you are ashamed of it. Why did you start going by Barack instead of Barry anyway, since Barry was the name you grew up with? I would understand that if you had converted to Islam.

Congressman John Lewis compared John McCain with George Wallace?

And last but not least, I am going to scream if I hear one more white voter say, “I am not prejudice, but I am not going to vote for Barack Obama.”

This is 2008. How about this? “I am not voting for Barack Obama because he is a liar with no experience who has hung out with shady characters, including an unrepentant terrorist, and he has the most liberal record in the Senate but people are dumb enough to buy his line that he will not raise taxes.”

Anybody in this day and age who is still racially-prejudice is an airhead, so why walk on egg shells and justify yourself if you do not like one candidate? Why is John McCain apologizing for things the Townhall crowd is saying? People can say what they want. This is America , and we are not supposed to be controlled in our speech by the news media or the democratic campaign, but most are wimping out in this war of intimidation.

Since 1976, no national poll has ever picked a Republican to win or showed one ahead prior to the Presidential election. Much of the national news media especially NBC is acting like a political PAC helping to get Barack Obama elected. Barney Frank, an openly-gay congressman who chairs the congressional banking committee and has rebuffed any and all attempts to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by republicans, has had an affair with a key executive of Fannie Mae, but none of the media calls for his resignation they are so scared of being called “homophobic.” If he was a republican, this would be the lead story on every news show and in every paper. If you question anything about anyone other than the media’s Golden Child, you are pounced upon. Some papers will not run this editorial simply because of the subject matter. Race and gender, and even sexual orientation, is not the issue in this election, unless you are a republican and heterosexual. If you are, you are to sit in the back of the bus and shut up. If not, you will be attacked by the news media, which have proven that they themselves are weapons of mass detraction.

Related posts:

1. Common Sense
2. America in 2010
3. Say No to John McCain!!!
4. The Obama Mafia
5. The Geezer, Witch or Sleeper Agent?

The lady on CSPAN that was taking calls from viewers eventually asked the guy that was watching the internet chatter what the buzz was on “the net.” He said that most people were talking about the “that one” comment by McCain. I watched the whole debate and I was not sure exactly what they were talking about. Thankfully they played the clip in reference and I soon realized that I did not pick up on the “that one” comment because I was not watching the debate through a “racist” prism. Basically McCain was talking about a bill that Bush and Cheney supported. McCain said very simply that he voted against it and pointing at Obama he said, “Guess who voted for it?” “That one.”

Now come the fuck on people, is this what we’ve come to? If I referred to a Mexican man as “that one” by saying, “I don’t like ice cream but guess who does? That one.” does that mean that I hate Mexicans? No it simply means that I don’t like ice cream but this man who is Mexican does. He could be black, brown, green, yellow, white, whatever, it doesn’t matter. It’s the fact that he likes “ice cream” and I don’t!

I thought this word was buried,..... RIGHT?

These people who are getting all butt hurt over this are acting like McCain called Obama a nigger! That’s right I said it and that’s what people are implying when they say that McCain’s comment was racist. I am not going to tip toe around it and if people are going to cast aspersions upon his character then I will call them out.

I read several comments by people on other blogs saying that, “This proves McCain is a racist” or “If you don’t vote for Obama you are a racist.”
I am not voting for Obama just because he is black and I am white. I am not voting for him because I disagree with just about every single issue he supports. It has nothing to do with his skin color. If Obama was white I would still dislike him just as much. I hope I am making myself perfectly clear.

Now if you are upset because a white guy used the “N” word you should be just as upset with blacks that use that same word. How can the “N” word be a “term of endearment” when used by blacks in a conversation with each other and be racist if I white guy uses it? That is a MAJOR DOUBLE STANDARD! How can you determine someone’s intent with that word by their skin color? You can’t! What if a white guy wants to use it as a “term of endearment” towards a black guy. How are YOU able to determine his intent as being sincere or racist? So if you wanna help to end racism then you’ve got to get rid of this double standard. To eliminate any confusion in the future over the “N” word it should be dropped from the vocabulary of ALL races.

Related posts:

1. Common Sense
2. Don Imus the DEMOCRAT!
3. The Anti-Police Bigotry Of The Obama Left
4. I Want Obama To Fail!!!
5. This is America, Wake Up!

Don Bendell

Dear Dr. McNicol-Stock;

In your opinion piece for the Philadelphia Enquirer dated September 14, 2008 entitled INTOLERANCE THRIVES IN PALIN’S PACIFIC NORTHWEST,  your trashing of Governor Sara Palin and the residents of 6 states you not only exceeded the boundaries of good taste you have provided a new definition for “low-class.” What is scary to me is the fact that you are part of academia and influence the brains of naïve young students at the Connecticut College where you teach history.

I know that I am just another one of those “rural” hicks who lives in “fly-over country” out in that vast space between New York and Los Angeles , and I am not a person of privilege living in New England or anywhere along the northeastern seaboard. Shucks, in fact I am just one a them old dumb Colorado cowboys, but doctor, in your editorial you stated, “Sarah Palin’s political views – ardently pro-gun, pro-censorship, anti-choice and anti-gay – make John McCain’s conservative credentials pale in comparison.” and that was the nicest thing you said about her. Before attacking your grievous insults of those who live in the Pacific Northwest as well as Governor Palin, I first want to correct some mis-statements of fact by you. Governor Palin has never, not one time, ever advocated censorship. In her interviews, she has made it quite clear that she supports man-woman marriage legislation, but she has also stated that she, like many Americans, has gay friends and does not judge them. In regards to her being pro-gun, it would be more appropriate to say that she is pro-second amendment. She is also clearly pro-life. Cool! You could not simply present an argument that she had differing political ideology from you and argue why you feel that she is wrong. You attacked all residents in the states of Alaska , Washington , Oregon , Idaho , Montana , and Wyoming as being racist, hate-filled, and you used serial killers, miscreants, and psychopaths to represent such residents, also clearly trying to use this guilt by association to attack Governor Palin.

Like many self-proclaimed want-to-be feminists you would not recognize a powerful, independent, liberated woman of honor and dignity if she was standing before you slapping your jowls back and forth with a caribou steak.

My wife Shirley is the sexiest, most beautiful woman I have ever known, but also the strongest, most courageous person, man or woman, I have ever known. Graduating from college with honors when she was a grandmother, she is public about being a former victim of both gang rape and acquaintance rape before I knew her but now is a master instructor in several martial arts and put together one of the top sexual assault prevention programs for women and girls around and has helped thousands. She is also public about being a recovering alcoholic and prescription drug addict for almost three decades and has helped literally hundreds of people with addiction or alcoholism-related problems.

Related posts:

1. Thing I Think McCain And Palin Should Say
2. THE PILOT AND THE PIN-UP
3. America is Under Attack!
4. OPEN LETTER TO US REP STEVE IRA COHEN, D., TENN.
5. Common Sense

But worse, much worse, I cannot believe that during a speech on Tuesday, September 9 that Barack Obama, a candidate for President of the USA made the comment, “You can put lipstick on a pig, and it is still a pig.” This remark was no accident coming one week after Sarah Palin’s very popular ad-lib during the Republican National Convention when her teleprompter went out, wherein she talked about lipstick being the difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull. That is an inappropriate, inexcusable, and totally classless remark by a Presidential candidate. Democrats in droves should call Barack Obama out for that remark, because I do not believe it is a comment any serious democrat would ever approve of saying about any woman running for political office. When Obama made the remark he even paused after grinning, while clearly playing the crowd, and saying, “You can put lipstick on a pig,” while the audience all around him started laughing and clapping before he delivered the punch-line. Sure, he can try to excuse himself by claiming that is an old saying, but the timing was very clear and unmistakable. Any democrat or any person who tries to justify Obama’s horrendous sexist remark is either in total denial or just plain stupid.

Then his running mate, Joe Biden in an almost equally-classless statement was recorded on a personal camcorder stating that Governor Palin running for the Vice Presidency “is a major step backwards for women.”

The Obama-Biden Campaign has sent a team of 30 attorneys and investigators to Alaska to dig up every speck of dirt they can find on Sarah Palin. Liberal blogs have been crucifying her with lies and innuendo. Liberal newspapers, TV news reporters, and magazines have been printing or saying horrible lies and gossip about her. I wanted to throw a book at the TV when I saw Bill O’Reilly soft-peddle it with so-called journalist Sally Quinn after he chastised her for slandering Governor Palin, and then gave her a free pass when she responded by saying that Sarah Palin has five children and one is special needs and she wants to know if Sarah Palin is going to put her country first or her family first. John McCain is a republican and has seven children, but Ms. Quinn never has mentioned that she wants to know if he will put his family first or country first. I have yet to hear any media person make such a remark about the size of a male candidate’s family, but I have heard many liberal commentators and left-leaning reporters hail Senator Joe Biden as a hero for taking care of his surviving children as a single father after the sad and unexpected death of his wife and daughter. Michelle Obama was crying over the story, yet nobody ever asked him if he could perform his duties while also being a single father. Why have several so-called news-people made such remarks about Governor Palin? They are clearly and totally sexist and inappropriate remarks.

Why are the democrats and their liberal followers in such a state of panic over a Vice Presidential candidate? The answer is simple: Governor Sarah Palin was the missing piece of the puzzle most Americans; democrats, independents, and republicans were looking for in this election. Sarah Palin is the answer.

I always told my kids when others were gossiping about them or attacking them, that “you can always tell the success or power of a man or woman by the amount of dogs nipping at their heels.” What people like Governor Palin’s detractors forgot was that it is very unwise, actually very stupid, to nip at the heels of a pitbull. When they end up getting chewed to pieces they have only themselves to blame.

Don Bendell

DETACHMENT-DELTA: Don’s newest novel. Worldwide release winter 2008.

Visit our newly-re-structured website. Learn how to get your first book published!: http://www.donbendell.com

“Life is tough and for stupid people its even tougher.” John Wayne

Don Bendell, 61, is an author of 26 books including a number of military thrillers with over 1,500,000 copies in print worldwide and is a popular editorialist who has appeared on FOX NEWS LIVE, many national radio shows, and his editorials have been published all over the world. A 1995 inductee into the International Karate Hall of Fame, he and his wife also own karate schools in southern Colorado . A 60% disabled vet, Don served as an officer in 4 Special Forces Groups, including a 1968-1969 tour on an A-team in Vietnam as well as in the Top Secret Phoenix Program and has offspring serving in Special Forces now. He lives in Florence , Colorado . Write him at don@donbendell.com .

Related posts:

1. Palin Attack by Catherine McNicol-Stock, PhD
2. OPEN LETTER TO US REP STEVE IRA COHEN, D., TENN.
3. Ron Paul and the Media
4. Democrats can’t win
5. Demo(n)crat News

Don’t believe The Communist News Network (CNN) or any of those other Leftist so called News Organizations. These Anti-American Groups are trying to shape this election, like they’ve done before. After Water Gate, The Press claimed they were the fourth Branch of Government…but they are wrong.

Sure, Barack “Hussein” Obama is attracting the lunatic fringe, the Anti-American hippie scum that wake up each day and hope for America to be taken over by some Socialist or Communist country.
They make up about 9% of the American population. They’ve always been there, throughout history; even during the Revolutionary War. Benjamin Franklin disowned his own son…because his son was loyal to England.

The people that hate this country are most often the ones who have either became rich here…or have spent their whole lives sucking your tax dollars through entitlement programs.

CNN makes such an issue of the Approval Rating for President Bush, which is around 32%…but they don’t say much about the Approval Rating for Congress…which is around 9%….??? That is NINE PERCENT!!! These are the wonderful Democrats that promised they’d do so much…and have done very little. What happened to all those things they promised they’d do the first one hundred hours and first one hundred days in office if they were elected???

Democrats have hated this country every since they lost The Civil War. It was Democrats who owned those Plantations and had the slaves in The Sounth. Democrats like Nathan Bedford Forrest started The Ku Klux Klan, and then pushed all of the Jim Crow Laws on the rest of the country.

Those who support Barack “Hussein” Obama do not care what happens to America……

Related posts:

1. What Would Obama Do?
2. Sheehan threatens Pelosi…
3. WHY OBAMA?
4. Barack Obama Wins!!!
5. The Obama Party

This is a Guest Opinion by Allen Holm. Though I do not support Ron Paul, I do support Freedom of Speech; and I’ve written enough opinions about Ron Paul myself, I think it is only fair to allow someone who supports him to reply. Whether you are Republican or Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, we should all be able to voice our opinions and not hate each other.
Thanks Allen!

It is obvious that Ron Paul is not the media darling. He gets little or no positive press. Every national known TV, radio, and newspaper gives their viewers listeners and readers the idea that he is not a viable candidate; continuing to refer to him as presidential “hopeful”, or “long-shot”, despite his incredible campaign growth. They portray his followers as 9/11 truther’s, wacko’s, vicious attack dogs, internet hackers, and even racists. Many people support him, and there are fringe groups that do, but they are not even close to the majority of us. The truth is, we want his message to be spread far and wide. Everyone who has heard him and has listened to him agree with him on key points. Those who do not are only those who do not listen to him or accept the truth in what he says. At the very least, he is one who speaks his mind, speaks with honesty, and has lived up to what he says.

The media is all about advertising, ALL of it, including the news. They want the widest distribution of their product, and the greatest impression of what their sponsors pay for. The problem with Ron Paul is his message is for the people and individual rights, not for making money. That is why those of us who support him feel a great need to continue the spread his views at a grassroots level to everyone. Hopefully the media will not be able to keep him from getting the nomination by “spinning” his views on every issue.

There are literally millions of good, honest, hard working people whose only knowledge of Ron Paul is what they see on the news. Few of them watch the debates, or even realize they do have a candidate who supports their views. They all know who Guliani is, who Hillary is, who Romney is, and who Obama is as these candidates are mentioned daily in the national news. Ron Paul is not. Most people would agree with much of what he says if they could only hear him without “spin”

He has won every online poll from every single televised debate. He has won the majority of the straw polls including these:
Conservative Leadership Conference, Reno, Nevada

Oregon Straw Poll- Portland, Oregon

CWA New Jersey GOP Straw Poll

South Sound Ronald Reagan Republican Club

Maryland Straw Poll

Ronald Reagan Club (Washington)

FreedomWorks Straw Poll

New Hampshire Taxpayers

Case in Point: October 21, 2007 – Orlando, Florida – Debate #6

Ron Paul not only did not get more time/questions, but that the hall was also stuffed, like a ballot box, with a pro-war crowd who actually cheered Rudy Guliani’s idea for a renewed arms race with Russia and booed Ron Paul when he pointed out 70% of the American people are against the war. They booed him even before he answered the stupid question “You’re against the Iraq war, so is Senator Clinton, so what are the differences between you?” He explained that Hillary was on their side of the issue. They paneled a group of “voters” where Douglas Maher, a partisan hack, called Ron Paul “certifiably insane” The media accused his supporters of cheating. They have excused the fact veterans and troops support him, and worst of all they have offered the American people one of the most pathetic staged debates for President in history. None of this is a surprise as this debate was set-up by (vice-President hopeful) Governor of Florida Charlie Crist, and FOXNEWS, not to mention that the tickets for the “crowd” were sold to the candidates. That is all but to Ron Paul.

Why is he still not a viable candidate for conservative Republicans as far as the media is concerned? He is not only viable, he is the frontrunner. And he is the ONLY candidate that can beat Hillary Clinton in the general election. Media or no media.

Related posts:

1. I’ll Support Ron Paul….
2. Ron Paul…Grand Rally!!!
3. Ron Paul Revilution
4. Ron Paul The Hemmorrhoid
5. Ron Paul The Clown

Sure you have. Not only are its reviews on music and movies fuckin skewed so are its “anti-whatever Bush is doing” articles. You know, the ones that try, and do, poison the minds of stupid teenagers and kids just wanting to know if the new Ludacris album talks about fucking whores and drinking kegs of beer as much as the last one. Now they have to deal with the stoned editor and his anti-bush aka anti-american articles. Isn’t this the same rag that says “don’t trust anyone over 30″ and it’s now about 40 years old.

Did you read their 200 greatest songs of all time issue? Well it seems that if your band was not famous before 1976, you suck!! Apparently only Led Zepplin, The Rolling Stones, and Pink Floyd know how to make top 200 music as they took about 60% of the the spots. Utter fuckin rubbish. Did you catch the article that said that social security is not in trouble? They must have not got the DNC talking points about how the Democrats agree that social security is in trouble, they just don’t like how the president wants to fix it. Of course they don’t give any “real” suggestions on how to fix it, they just bash the president. I bet the next issue will have supposed Native American Ward Churchill on the cover with the quote, “A fresh new voice for free speech in America.”

Or did you catch the article on Michael Moore? Quote “Fahrenheit 9/11 was the biggest documentary of all time not to mention one of the funniest and most disturbing. But the really scary things is that Bush won anyway.” One gets the sense that the writers actually thought that Moores movie was gonna sway the election. Also the only disturbing thing about the movie is that he made shit up. You know like the thing about Bush reading the book upside down to the kids. I liked the part about how Moore criticized Bush for doing little for the first few minutes after the attacks. What the fuck did you want him to do? Freak out some kids and go crazy, run to the broom closet and issue nuke codes? I sure if someone else was president they would have killed Bin Laden within 30 seconds. Give me a fuckin break. Obviously the Rolling Stone is the only magazine with “the facts.”

FUCK ROLLING STONE!

Related posts:

1. Crazy Shit From A Crazy Bitch
2. Americas Finest
3. Democrats caused the shooting…
4. Waaahhhh! BooHoo! Bitch! Whine!
5. Genarlow Wilson, victim of Douglas County..